Further information: Medical Treatment of Unstable Angina, Acute Non–ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, and Coronary Artery Spasm (see p937), Pathophysiology and Clinical Impact of Diastolic Heart Failure (see p1201) and Dilated Cardiomyopathy (see p1233) from Cardiovascular Medicine, 3rd Edn*

This article [1] contains observations from the Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 36) Trial (MERLIN-TIMI 36), a trial conducted at 440 sites between 2004 and 2007 to determine the efficacy and safety of ranolazine in long-term treatment of 6500 patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). As part of the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial, investigators designed a prospective evaluation of the interaction between B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the effect of ranolazine in patients with ACS. Because elevated BNP and the N-terminal portion of BNP prohormone identify patients at high risk of death and heart failure (HF), intense effort is being made to find treatments that would mitigate the risk of elevated BNP. There were 4543 baseline samples in which BNP had been measured from patients who had been randomized to ranolazine or placebo, and the patients were followed for 343 days. BNP elevation was defined as >80 pg/ml. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), and recurrent ischemia.

Results showed that in 1935 patients with elevated BNP (>80 pg/ml), the risk of the primary end-point was higher (26.4% vs. 20.4%, P=0.0001), higher for CV death (8.0% vs. 2.1%, P<0.001, and higher for MI (10.6% vs. 5.8%, P<0.001) at 1 year. The primary end-point was reduced by ranolazine (hazard ratio [HR]; 0.79; 95% confidence internal [CI]: 0.66–0.94, P=0.009). For recurrent ischemia in patients with elevated BNP, the effect of ranolazine was directionally similar (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62–0.98; P=0.04) and CV death or MI (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.66–1.05, P=0.12). Ranolazine had no effect on patients without elevated BNP, did not reduce BNP concentration over time, and did not reduce the clinical end-point for patients with new or worsening HF. Nevertheless, it did identify patients at high risk of recurrent myocardial ischemia ameliorated by ranolazine. Therefore, the investigators concluded that the effects of ranolazine warrant additional study.

In an editorial [2] in this same issue of JACC, the authors stated that while this carefully done study does not provide conclusive evidence that ranolazine should be used in patients with ACS and elevated BNP levels, it does lay the groundwork for a prospective clinical trial.

[1] Morrow DA, Scirica BM, Sabatine MS, et al. B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and the Effect of Ranolazine in Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;55:1189-96

[2] Califf RM, Shah SH, Newby LK. Biomarker Bonanza? J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;55:1197-99
 
Note: You may need subscriptions to access content from links on this page. You are responsible for obtaining these subscriptions.

* To view the online text from the book, please navigate to SpringerLink or use the DVD to access electronic content. SpringerLink is a subscription service. For further information, click here.